• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Part15

Part15

License Free, legal, low-power radio broadcasting

  • About Us
  • Forums
  • Resources
  • Members
  • Contact Us
  • Log In
Forums
Main Category
Transmitter Talk
Long wave part 15 t...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Long wave part 15 transmitter

 
Page 1 / 2 Next
Transmitter Talk
Last Post by Anonymous 9 years ago
19 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
3,445 Views
RSS
 Capt. Kidd
(@capt-kidd)
Posts: 1
New Member Registered
Topic starter
 

Does anyone know where I can find a part 15 long wave transmitte? North country Radio had one but it was discontinue.


 
Posted : 02/01/2018 11:31 am
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

Long Wave From the Past

Palomar Engineering, a company that still exists, long ago discontinued their part 15 long wave transmitter, and they no longer respond to inquiries about it.

The unit has shown up rarely on Ebay.

This schematic might make it possible for you to build.

Palomar Legnedary LW Transmitter


 
Posted : 02/01/2018 3:38 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

Looks like an easy build, but it also looks like a CW transmitter. No voice modulation, unless you are in an experimental mood. 


 
Posted : 03/01/2018 1:06 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

Instructions for AM modulating are included in the text of the pdf.  It's quite simple to do. 

 

TIB


 
Posted : 03/01/2018 2:20 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

Capt. Kidd asked:  "Does anyone know where I can find a part 15 long wave transmitte? North country Radio had one but it was discontinue."

Check this out:

http://www.6v6.co.uk/transmitters/solid-state-transmitters/mosquito-am-one-watt-transmitter-us.html


 
Posted : 03/01/2018 2:31 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

looks easy enoug. I may have to give i a try. Thanks 


 
Posted : 05/01/2018 12:18 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

That Mosquito transmitter looks nice but it is 1w transmitter if the power is not adjustable the you can not use in the US.  Would be cool to test for a few hrs to see how much range you could get with 1w on am, maybe 6 to 8 miles with a good antenna with a decent amount of height. 


 
Posted : 05/01/2018 4:42 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

Several years back a group of us here at part15_us started designing a long wave transmitter on paper, but the poroject got set aside until the day when we pick it up again and continue.

The name of the project is "Deep Voice" and there's even a link to the incomplete work, which I will post here sometime.

2018 looks like a good year to complete that project.


 
Posted : 06/01/2018 4:47 am
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

Reply to comment # 7...."That Mosquito transmitter looks nice but it is 1w transmitter if the power is not adjustable the you can not use in the US."

When you look at the ad, it explains that it also will broadcast on the 160M band.  So, it actually IS legal in the U.S.  on some frequencies in that band--you can have 1 watt and approximately a 50' antenna.  However, it would NOT be legal to use it in the 'broadcast' band.  I posted the ad in response to Capt. Kidd's question about a long wave transmitter.  With a proper antenna and grounding sytem on the 160M band, it could have a pretty good range.


 
Posted : 06/01/2018 5:38 am
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

The spec for the Mosquito show frequencies from 450 kHz to about 2 mHz.

Long wave Part 15 operation is 160 to 190 kHz at 1 watt into a 15 meter antenna

So as stated if you turn down the power it could be used on the AM BCB.

160 meters is an Amateur Radio band from 1.8 to 2 mHz.  Hams can use any antenna and much more than 1 watt.


 
Posted : 06/01/2018 9:31 am
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

LF band rules

LF band (160-190 kHz) AM is allowed under FCC Part 15.217. It's similar to Part 15.219 we are familiar with in that a DC input power and a maximum antenna length is defined. For 15.217 it's 1 watt to a 15-meter antenna. 

Antenna and intentionally making it lossy

A major parameter driving the antenna design is bandwidth. We need enough bandwidth to pass a 10 kHz or wider signal and this sets our maximum antenna Q as 180kHz/10kHz = 18. The ratio of antenna reactance to system loss can be no higher than 18. Using EZNEC we see that a 15-meter mast having a diameter of 10 cm has a reactance of about 5000 ohms and a radiation resistance of about 0.04 ohms. To achieve a Q of 18, system loss must be 5000/18 = 280 ohms. One might have to add series resistance to get the Q this low. 

Radiated Power

The radiation efficiency of this antenna is 0.04ohms/280ohms x 100% = 0.014%. Contrast this with the 0.25% radiation efficiency of a simple MF Part 15.219 AM BC antenna; the difference is a factor of 18, meaning 1 watt into the LF antenna radiates a signal like 0.056 watts into the MF antenna. 

Range

So far it looks like our LF range would be similar to our MF range. But given the higher ambient RF noise level on the LF band our range could be much less. The graph at the link below (curve C) shows approximately 25 dB higher ambient noise. If we need 500uV/m at MF to have a useful signal we need 25 dB above 500uV/m at LF. This is about 10 mV/m and in the far-field the corresponding magnetic field is about 30uA/m. For average ground, and 1 watt to this antenna, EZNEC shows 30uA/m at a range of 50 meters. This analysis assumes the same antenna factor at LF and MF, which might not be the case.  

https://www.itu.int/dms_pubrec/itu-r/rec/p/R-REC-P.372-7-200102-S!!PDF-E.pdf


 
Posted : 06/01/2018 11:06 am
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

Very excellent workup, daveC.

If my previous studies are correct, the U.S. has never used long wave for broadcasting but has used it for aviation related use, which may still be true on some frequencies.

There's also (I think) experimental HAM on some frequencies.

It has been used for carrier current baby monitors and 2-way intercoms, but with lower power than the AM band carrier current rule.

It is used for carrier current power utility communications for the power industry.

Long wave has been a very strong broadcasting service in Europe using 9 kHz channel spacing, but in the U.S. since no standard exists one may use either 10 kHz or 9 kHz channels (so I think I was told by someone).

I have a CFL light bulb that seriously dominates the LW band so I only use that bulb on rare occasions.


 
Posted : 06/01/2018 11:37 am
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

This is a reference to what can be used in the U.S. on the Mosquito 1 Watt Am transmitter.

"A LowFER is a low frequency radio propagation beacon (or occasionally other type of station), run by a hobbyist under FCC Part 15 rules. The word is an acronym of Low Frequency Experimental Radio.

Unlicensed LowFER operation is allowed in the frequency range 160 - 190 kHz, the so called 1750 meters band.  In this frequncy range transmitters may not use antennas longer than fifty feet (including any transmission line between the transmitter and the antenna). RF stage input power is restricted to a maximum of 1 W. Due to these restrictions, LowFER transmitters are usually located at the base (feeding and grounding point) of a vertical antenna.

LowFERs usualy transmit morse code telegraphy, slow speed telegraphy and various digital modes. Speech transmission (AM or SSB) is also allowed but seldomly used.

Most of the tranmitting equipment for the LowFER band is homemade, but commercial equipment becomes available occasionally.

Even with such limited stations, LowFER stations have been received at distances approaching 1000 miles by listeners using sophisticated receiving setups at electrically quiet locations."

Again, I only mentioned this in answer to the orginal question by Capt. Kidd about a long wave transmitter.


 
Posted : 06/01/2018 3:14 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

Another reference:

https://www.lfengineering.com/lf-vlf-communications.cfm


 
Posted : 06/01/2018 6:05 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

LOWFERs sometimes use Morse code at around 1/2000 word per minute. It can take 30 minutes to send a callsign and the signal is observed on a waterfall display. The receiver setup consists of a very stable receiver, a PC, and some free software. The receiver bandwidth is 0.01 Hz, giving LOWFERs a 1,000,000-to-1 advantage over a 10 kHz AM signal. 

Adding a top hat to the 50 ft antenna can potentially quadruple the radiation resistance and reduce the antenna reactance. While maintaining the Q-of-18 needed to pass an AM signal we might aim for a 10X radiation efficiency improvement and 3X range improvement. 

I recall reading somewhere that the first SSB transmission was performed at 50 kHz with the limited antenna bandwidth being used to attenuate one of the two sidebands. 


 
Posted : 07/01/2018 12:01 pm
Page 1 / 2 Next
Forum Jump:
  Previous Topic
Next Topic  
Share:
Forum Information
Recent Posts
Unread Posts
Tags
  • 13 Forums
  • 7,756 Topics
  • 63.6 K Posts
  • 12 Online
  • 2,249 Members
Our newest member: electronic
Latest Post: Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers
Forum Icons: Forum contains no unread posts Forum contains unread posts
Topic Icons: Not Replied Replied Active Hot Sticky Unapproved Solved Private Closed

Primary Sidebar

Online Members

 No online members at the moment

Recent Posts

  • RichPowers

    Ultra long range Part 15 broadcasting (to space)

    While car makers appear to be opting for the licenced s...

    By RichPowers , 4 hours ago

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    Shows for FM but applies to AM also.

    By Mark , 4 days ago

  • Mark

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I don't think the audio quality would be that good on t...

    By Mark , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I was very tempted to buy them both, they were dirt che...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    @mark I had to pause when you mentioned "15 minute citi...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

Recent Topics

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    By Mark 4 days ago

  • RichPowers

    Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    By RichPowers 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    From Virtue to Vice - Music Morality

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    affordable DAC Impressive Versatility “audiophile quality” Promising Big performance at small price

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    New Canadian Resident?

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

Topic Tags

  • Carl Blare3
  • KDX RADIO3
  • WINDOZE3
  • Transmitter2
  • Radio Phvern2
  • station upgrade2
  • archive.org2
  • playlist2
  • Zara Radio2
  • #SW2101
View all tags (75)

Copyright © 2026 · Part15.org · Log in

‹›×

    ‹›×