• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Part15

Part15

License Free, legal, low-power radio broadcasting

  • About Us
  • Forums
  • Resources
  • Members
  • Contact Us
  • Log In
Forums
Main Category
temp
Two Frequency's
 
Notifications
Clear all

Two Frequency's

 
temp
Last Post by Anonymous 22 years ago
2 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
548 Views
RSS
 sticklizard
(@sticklizard)
Posts: 7
Eminent Member Registered
Topic starter
 

Two Frequency's

Hi guys! 😀 Hope ya'll had pleanty of turkey. We had all we wanted to eat at my house. I have another question . Can I put two antenna's on the same tower on different frequency's? I was thinking we could do two stations (ie. 1610 and 1700) with different content with just a little more work. In talking to people in this small town it seems to be split between rock and country. I guess what I am asking would they bleed? We are still in the planning stage and content seems to be the only problem. I am still learning abut LPAM. If it wasn't for this PART15 web site I would still be in the dark. 😕 Thanks in advance for your help. Dan 🙂


 
Posted : 25/11/2004 9:37 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

Hmm... The only possible problem I see right off is that the antennas themselves will act as directive arrays, thus will affect the radiation patterns of each other, favoring the line that the antennas are aligned in. Or something like that.

But that brings up another interesting possibility. Rather than try to synchronize two separated transmitters/antennas on one frequency, to extend range, put the distant transmitter on a separate frequency, well separated as you propose -- if the channel is clear, a condition I have here and so could do. (For daytime, I have the "X-band" pretty clear here.)

Bill


 
Posted : 26/11/2004 4:07 pm
Forum Jump:
  Previous Topic
Next Topic  
Share:
Forum Information
Recent Posts
Unread Posts
Tags
  • 13 Forums
  • 7,756 Topics
  • 63.6 K Posts
  • 14 Online
  • 2,249 Members
Our newest member: electronic
Latest Post: Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers
Forum Icons: Forum contains no unread posts Forum contains unread posts
Topic Icons: Not Replied Replied Active Hot Sticky Unapproved Solved Private Closed

Primary Sidebar

Online Members

 No online members at the moment

Recent Posts

  • RichPowers

    Ultra long range Part 15 broadcasting (to space)

    While car makers appear to be opting for the licenced s...

    By RichPowers , 18 hours ago

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    Shows for FM but applies to AM also.

    By Mark , 4 days ago

  • Mark

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I don't think the audio quality would be that good on t...

    By Mark , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I was very tempted to buy them both, they were dirt che...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    @mark I had to pause when you mentioned "15 minute citi...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

Recent Topics

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    By Mark 4 days ago

  • RichPowers

    Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    By RichPowers 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    From Virtue to Vice - Music Morality

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    affordable DAC Impressive Versatility “audiophile quality” Promising Big performance at small price

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    New Canadian Resident?

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

Topic Tags

  • Carl Blare3
  • KDX RADIO3
  • WINDOZE3
  • Transmitter2
  • Radio Phvern2
  • station upgrade2
  • archive.org2
  • playlist2
  • Zara Radio2
  • #SW2101
View all tags (75)

Copyright © 2026 · Part15.org · Log in

‹›×

    ‹›×