• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Part15

Part15

License Free, legal, low-power radio broadcasting

  • About Us
  • Forums
  • Resources
  • Members
  • Contact Us
  • Log In
Forums
Main Category
temp
Trerrestrial vs Onl...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Trerrestrial vs Online radio royalties

 
temp
Last Post by Anonymous 11 years ago
6 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
598 Views
RSS
RichPowers
 RichPowers
(@richpowers)
Posts: 3404
Illustrious Member Registered
Topic starter
 

Via a link from the Radio World newsletter I was reading an article entitled "Online-only radio stations offer a distinct freedom of expression", and there was one line that really jumped out at me:

"..Traditional, or terrestrial, radio stations pay royalties to songwriters only, but online stations pay songwriters, artists and labels..."

I am guessing this must be common knowledge to most of you? but I never realized this.

Online Radio Stations Offer Freedom (Greenville Online)
What motivates someone to start an Internet radio station? The answer can vary.


 
Posted : 07/01/2016 4:02 am
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

That is true only as it relates to the terrestrial signal.  The radio station's stream pays royalties also to the performer.


 
Posted : 07/01/2016 4:44 am
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

Very true, and a heap of a lot cheaper.


 
Posted : 07/01/2016 9:03 am
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

This is something that has been kept from John Q public for quite some time. Online stations play almost triple what terrestrial radio pays for over the air royalties. It is far from being fair in fact it should be illegal to demand that small webcasters pay triple what commercial broadcasters pay we need to petition hard to get the stopped. Otherwise the only radio stations allowed both on the internet or terrestrial will be corporate and that truly in my definition is a monopoly.


 
Posted : 07/01/2016 7:13 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

Again, remember a streamer has the whole WORLD as potential audience.  Terrestrial has only as far as their signal reaches. A streamer with a setup in his basement or a commercial broadcaster streaming has the same potential audience online, and that's the WORLD.

Case in point. I've mentioned them before. WREN in Topeka, KS is a streaming only station. Started by a bunch of old fart DJ's who wanted to bring back the over the air WREN from years ago only to find out doing so would have cost them hundreds of thousands of dollars. So they started a streaming only station with a free computer given to one of the guys.  Now, 4 years later they have 200,000 streaming listeners monthly and are the number one station in NE Kansas. They show up in the Arbitrons, and beat all the corporate stations in the ratings. The have a full staff of DJ's and sales people, and a studio/office in the NOTO arts district. 

So, yes, a guy with a computer can stream to the world.  I'd say 200,000+ listeners a month would make any of us pretty happy.  These guys did it. 

TIB


 
Posted : 08/01/2016 1:52 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

The problem with the royalty rates as they are is that you really don't know who is connecting to your stream, and if they're a real listener or just a robot.

I get over 100 listener connections a day on my IceCast server when its running, but there are certainly real listeners, but many last only a few seconds.  Plus at one time I was getting spammed by some servers out of Europe that are known for this kind of activity - before I blocked that set of IP addresses, I had over 20,000 listener connections.

That would be expensive.


 
Posted : 09/01/2016 5:38 pm
Forum Jump:
  Previous Topic
Next Topic  
Share:
Forum Information
Recent Posts
Unread Posts
Tags
  • 13 Forums
  • 7,756 Topics
  • 63.6 K Posts
  • 20 Online
  • 2,249 Members
Our newest member: electronic
Latest Post: Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers
Forum Icons: Forum contains no unread posts Forum contains unread posts
Topic Icons: Not Replied Replied Active Hot Sticky Unapproved Solved Private Closed

Primary Sidebar

Online Members

 No online members at the moment

Recent Posts

  • RichPowers

    Ultra long range Part 15 broadcasting (to space)

    While car makers appear to be opting for the licenced s...

    By RichPowers , 19 hours ago

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    Shows for FM but applies to AM also.

    By Mark , 4 days ago

  • Mark

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I don't think the audio quality would be that good on t...

    By Mark , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I was very tempted to buy them both, they were dirt che...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    @mark I had to pause when you mentioned "15 minute citi...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

Recent Topics

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    By Mark 4 days ago

  • RichPowers

    Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    By RichPowers 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    From Virtue to Vice - Music Morality

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    affordable DAC Impressive Versatility “audiophile quality” Promising Big performance at small price

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    New Canadian Resident?

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

Topic Tags

  • Carl Blare3
  • KDX RADIO3
  • WINDOZE3
  • Transmitter2
  • Radio Phvern2
  • station upgrade2
  • archive.org2
  • playlist2
  • Zara Radio2
  • #SW2101
View all tags (75)

Copyright © 2026 · Part15.org · Log in

‹›×

    ‹›×