• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Part15

Part15

License Free, legal, low-power radio broadcasting

  • About Us
  • Forums
  • Resources
  • Members
  • Contact Us
  • Log In
Forums
Main Category
temp
The Part 15 Operato...
 
Notifications
Clear all

The Part 15 Operator's Favorite FCC Agent

 
temp
Last Post by Anonymous 11 years ago
14 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
415 Views
RSS
 wdcx
(@wdcx)
Posts: 444
Noble Member Registered
Topic starter
 


 
Posted : 19/08/2015 9:32 am
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

The paperwork is about the only thing in the picture I imagined of an FCC agent.  I thought they would wear a suit or something more professional that that outfit.  Wow what a shocker.


 
Posted : 19/08/2015 12:11 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

NO FCC field agent woukl have legal cause to issue NOUOs to the operators of unlicensed AM/FM transmit systems which by FCC inspections/measurements, actually complied with Part 15.

But evidently,

1) the beliefs of the operators of those setups as to their compliance with Part 15 were in conflict with the realities upon which the FCC issued NOUOs to them, or

2) Observance of Part 15 was not important to such operators.


 
Posted : 19/08/2015 2:10 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

Hi Guys: Question.

Who is that man ?

Remember Protol call, He should dress nice.

But keep in mind if you want to catch someone you dress like everyone else to throw them off guard and surprize them.

But as long your nice and work with fcc agent and have nothing to hide and follow rules you will be fine.

That all for now 

station 8

 


 
Posted : 19/08/2015 3:15 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

... follow rules you will be fine. ...

True.

But those rules first must be understood, before they can be followed.


 
Posted : 19/08/2015 3:24 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

Rich declares:   But evidently,

1) the beliefs of the operators of those setups as to their compliance with Part 15 were in conflict with the realities upon which the FCC issued NOUOs to them, or

2) Observance of Part 15 was not important to such operators.

I do not find it so evident that Part 15 operators are uniformly at fault while FCC inspectors are holy in their faultlessness.


 
Posted : 19/08/2015 3:34 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

Hi Guys: 

All i have to say the ball can go both ways.

station 8


 
Posted : 19/08/2015 3:51 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

... I do not find it so evident that Part 15 operators are uniformly at fault. ...

Neither do I -- only for those operators using systems that are non-compliant with Part 15.


 
Posted : 19/08/2015 4:33 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

Why does it matter so much to you?


 
Posted : 19/08/2015 4:42 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

Why does it matter so much to you?

Because it might matter to readers other than you and me.


 
Posted : 19/08/2015 4:49 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

I haven't noticed any such interest.


 
Posted : 19/08/2015 5:13 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

I am OK with the way he is dressed. In the case of KENC, the station operator got argumentive and things went downhill from there. At least that is what I have been led to belive.


 
Posted : 20/08/2015 4:47 am
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

It sounds like if an FCC representative shows up and askes to see the transmitter or requests it is turned off the required thing to do is comply. https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/47/15.5

Also even if a transmitter is part 15 compliant if there is harmful interference the operator can be required to turn it off. So that is where transmitting on a channel a licensed station uses can be a problem.


 
Posted : 20/08/2015 5:50 am
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

The agent in the picture looks like a nice man.


 
Posted : 20/08/2015 6:19 am
Forum Jump:
  Previous Topic
Next Topic  
Share:
Forum Information
Recent Posts
Unread Posts
Tags
  • 13 Forums
  • 7,756 Topics
  • 63.6 K Posts
  • 15 Online
  • 2,249 Members
Our newest member: electronic
Latest Post: Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers
Forum Icons: Forum contains no unread posts Forum contains unread posts
Topic Icons: Not Replied Replied Active Hot Sticky Unapproved Solved Private Closed

Primary Sidebar

Online Members

 No online members at the moment

Recent Posts

  • RichPowers

    Ultra long range Part 15 broadcasting (to space)

    While car makers appear to be opting for the licenced s...

    By RichPowers , 1 day ago

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    Shows for FM but applies to AM also.

    By Mark , 5 days ago

  • Mark

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I don't think the audio quality would be that good on t...

    By Mark , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I was very tempted to buy them both, they were dirt che...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    @mark I had to pause when you mentioned "15 minute citi...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

Recent Topics

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    By Mark 5 days ago

  • RichPowers

    Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    By RichPowers 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    From Virtue to Vice - Music Morality

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    affordable DAC Impressive Versatility “audiophile quality” Promising Big performance at small price

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    New Canadian Resident?

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

Topic Tags

  • Carl Blare3
  • KDX RADIO3
  • WINDOZE3
  • Transmitter2
  • Radio Phvern2
  • station upgrade2
  • archive.org2
  • playlist2
  • Zara Radio2
  • #SW2101
View all tags (75)

Copyright © 2026 · Part15.org · Log in

‹›×

    ‹›×