• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Part15

Part15

License Free, legal, low-power radio broadcasting

  • About Us
  • Forums
  • Resources
  • Members
  • Contact Us
  • Log In
Forums
Main Category
temp
Talking House Help ...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Talking House Help Please

 
Page 4 / 4 Prev
temp
Last Post by Anonymous 14 years ago
50 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
4,470 Views
RSS
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

"I have another which looks exactly the same, but its sound is not as good. Once again, I think this has more to do with parts used in batches."

The clue between those two units would be C301. If there is a .1uF NP cap at C301, then it's the better TH V5. If C301 has a .47uF tantalum (green) then it's the older version of the V5.

Either of those are perfectly fine under the current certification as C301 has nothing to do with the modulator circuit or the finals. C301 merely couples audio to the op amp IC which drives the modulator/current amplifier circuit.

RFB


 
Posted : 08/11/2012 9:01 am
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

"Those so-called mods are not illegal until the FCC says they are."

Indeed. It would be foolish for any of us, or anyone else to suggest otherwise, legal or illegal.

" If your Talking House has an FCC certification ID, then it's certified, until the FCC states otherwise."

For now. The hard evidence clearly shows modifications done to circuits that are not supposed to be modified. Anyone can clearly see it by simply opening up their iAM unit and a THV5 unit and see those modified circuits..to which Part 2.1043(a) says those circuits cannot be modified without resubmitting the unit for re-certification.

By definition, that means the iAM should be marketed under it's OWN unique certification since the iAM is a modified TH V5 unit.

"Don't let speculation from others worry you."

This isn't speculation AR. This is cold hard undeniable fact that can be validated by simply looking at the two units and noting both carry the same certification number, and no official OET documentation that the modified unit was approved to continue to be marketed under that same TH V5 certification.

The scales of the evidence do not side with the throw it to the wind prospective with this issue.

What I suggest is those who are thinking about buying an iAM unit, might want to do some homework first and consider a TH V5 unit instead..until the question of this matter is officially resolved by the FCC and OET, and not members of some forum or group of over excited end users.

RFB


 
Posted : 08/11/2012 9:23 am
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

I shucked the talking house mod since my wife talked to her cousin up north who has one of the newer TH-4.6? She is bringing it down Thanksgiving, free of charge (she used to be in real estate...). So 880 (Liberty Radio) will be up before I get the Ramsey AM25 built! Thanks for all of the great information and help...


 
Posted : 16/11/2012 9:47 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

Solar Radio Day and Night is attracting more good luck with a new transmitter being delivered right to the door.

KSOL is a moving force BEFORE it is a moving force.


 
Posted : 16/11/2012 9:55 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

"The clue between those two units would be C301. If there is a .1uF NP cap at C301, then it's the better TH V5. If C301 has a .47uF tantalum (green) then it's the older version of the V5."

Good info ... I'll take a look. Thanks!


 
Posted : 17/11/2012 12:41 pm
Page 4 / 4 Prev
Forum Jump:
  Previous Topic
Next Topic  
Share:
Forum Information
Recent Posts
Unread Posts
Tags
  • 13 Forums
  • 7,756 Topics
  • 63.6 K Posts
  • 29 Online
  • 2,249 Members
Our newest member: electronic
Latest Post: Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers
Forum Icons: Forum contains no unread posts Forum contains unread posts
Topic Icons: Not Replied Replied Active Hot Sticky Unapproved Solved Private Closed

Primary Sidebar

Online Members

 No online members at the moment

Recent Posts

  • RichPowers

    Ultra long range Part 15 broadcasting (to space)

    While car makers appear to be opting for the licenced s...

    By RichPowers , 24 hours ago

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    Shows for FM but applies to AM also.

    By Mark , 5 days ago

  • Mark

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I don't think the audio quality would be that good on t...

    By Mark , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I was very tempted to buy them both, they were dirt che...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    @mark I had to pause when you mentioned "15 minute citi...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

Recent Topics

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    By Mark 5 days ago

  • RichPowers

    Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    By RichPowers 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    From Virtue to Vice - Music Morality

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    affordable DAC Impressive Versatility “audiophile quality” Promising Big performance at small price

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    New Canadian Resident?

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

Topic Tags

  • Carl Blare3
  • KDX RADIO3
  • WINDOZE3
  • Transmitter2
  • Radio Phvern2
  • station upgrade2
  • archive.org2
  • playlist2
  • Zara Radio2
  • #SW2101
View all tags (75)

Copyright © 2026 · Part15.org · Log in

‹›×

    ‹›×