• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Part15

Part15

License Free, legal, low-power radio broadcasting

  • About Us
  • Forums
  • Resources
  • Members
  • Contact Us
  • Log In
Forums
Main Category
temp
Setup Question
 
Notifications
Clear all

Setup Question

 
temp
Last Post by Anonymous 13 years ago
3 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
805 Views
RSS
 GrooTheWanderer
(@groothewanderer)
Posts: 15
Eminent Member Registered
Topic starter
 

Hey guys,

            I came apon this youtube video about a guys setup and was wondering what yall thought of his opinions. Would I really benefit from adding a 32 band eq? To me what he says about it makes sense, but what do I know lol 🙂

 

Groo


 
Posted : 15/08/2013 5:23 am
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

For Part 15 over the air AM transmission, my opinion is that it's overkill.  AM is not high fidelity in the first place.  Plus once you start getting any sort of distance from your transmitter, noise will creep in, kind of offsetting any gains in quality you might get from the equalizer.

If you're streaming over the Internet at high bit rates, then it might make some sense.


 
Posted : 15/08/2013 9:54 am
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

The only useful application for a 32-band EQ is to tune a loudspeaker so that it performs with uniform response in am indoor space, but even that is somewhat pointless as the acoustics of a room vary as you move around.

For AM it is helpful to be able to roll-off the top end to remain within the 10kHz bandwidth, possibly pre-emphasize the highs from 1kHz up to about 8kHz, which is a selectable choise built into SSTran AMT3000 & 5000.

3-band equalizers have been used for AM.

All other improvements are based on compression and limiting, not EQing.


 
Posted : 15/08/2013 10:59 am
Forum Jump:
  Previous Topic
Next Topic  
Share:
Forum Information
Recent Posts
Unread Posts
Tags
  • 13 Forums
  • 7,756 Topics
  • 63.6 K Posts
  • 17 Online
  • 2,249 Members
Our newest member: electronic
Latest Post: Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers
Forum Icons: Forum contains no unread posts Forum contains unread posts
Topic Icons: Not Replied Replied Active Hot Sticky Unapproved Solved Private Closed

Primary Sidebar

Online Members

 No online members at the moment

Recent Posts

  • RichPowers

    Ultra long range Part 15 broadcasting (to space)

    While car makers appear to be opting for the licenced s...

    By RichPowers , 17 hours ago

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    Shows for FM but applies to AM also.

    By Mark , 4 days ago

  • Mark

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I don't think the audio quality would be that good on t...

    By Mark , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I was very tempted to buy them both, they were dirt che...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    @mark I had to pause when you mentioned "15 minute citi...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

Recent Topics

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    By Mark 4 days ago

  • RichPowers

    Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    By RichPowers 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    From Virtue to Vice - Music Morality

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    affordable DAC Impressive Versatility “audiophile quality” Promising Big performance at small price

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    New Canadian Resident?

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

Topic Tags

  • Carl Blare3
  • KDX RADIO3
  • WINDOZE3
  • Transmitter2
  • Radio Phvern2
  • station upgrade2
  • archive.org2
  • playlist2
  • Zara Radio2
  • #SW2101
View all tags (75)

Copyright © 2026 · Part15.org · Log in

‹›×

    ‹›×