• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Part15

Part15

License Free, legal, low-power radio broadcasting

  • About Us
  • Forums
  • Resources
  • Members
  • Contact Us
  • Log In
Forums
Main Category
temp
Remote control AM t...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Remote control AM transmitter?

 
temp
Last Post by Anonymous 20 years ago
4 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
745 Views
RSS
 krimles
(@krimles)
Posts: 9
Eminent Member Registered
Topic starter
 

Does any one know of a PC controllable Part 15 outdoor AM transmitter? This would seem to be a cool idea, but maybe I'm overlooking some problem here.


 
Posted : 01/01/2007 2:04 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

What would you like to control?

The rangemaster has an external sync computer, and most transmitters now are microprocessor controlled.

Many broadcasters use a PC for audio control.

What else would you like to manage?

Just curious...

Experimental broadcasting for a better tomorrow!


 
Posted : 01/01/2007 4:48 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

S.D.R. = Software Defined Radio 🙂

Frequency

Power Level

Antenna Tuning

Audio Gain

Limiter Level

Synch and audio delay

Remote monitoring and control of above parameters

good for multisite setups to keep them in compliance.

just a few things that come to mind.

Thank You,

Rev. Robert P. Chrysafis
Universal Life Ministries
http://www.ulc.org

Moderator Hunterdonfree
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/hunterdonfree


 
Posted : 01/01/2007 6:07 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

I see the setup as having an external unit connected to a head unit in the studio.

One possibility (using a PC)...
The TX could have a full RS232 interface so that it could be mounted and then parameters such as frequency, power level, antenna tuning, audio processing etc. changed later. This would no doubt add cost. Another disadvantage would be that a PC would be needed to set up the TX.
On the other hand, some of those parameters could be redundant. The frequency would likely not have to be changed because that would have been decided earlier based on available frequencies in the broadcast area. Power level could be handled actively in the transmitter to be the FCC maximum. Local audio processing (noise gate, compression and limiting) could be changed if needed.

Another possibility (no PC)...
Using no RS232, but have a semi-type of control with tuning done remotely. The audio processing could be done at the head unit in the studio (or disabled and other external gear used).

A previous post pointed out that Actradio (previously TalkingHouse) has a patent on automatic tuning for Part 15 AM TXs, so anyone trying to do this would probably get sued sometime in the future. I still cannot believe these guys were able to get that patent through! I was just wondering what people thought about having a more sophisticated AM TX.


 
Posted : 01/01/2007 6:30 pm
Forum Jump:
  Previous Topic
Next Topic  
Share:
Forum Information
Recent Posts
Unread Posts
Tags
  • 13 Forums
  • 7,756 Topics
  • 63.6 K Posts
  • 11 Online
  • 2,249 Members
Our newest member: electronic
Latest Post: Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers
Forum Icons: Forum contains no unread posts Forum contains unread posts
Topic Icons: Not Replied Replied Active Hot Sticky Unapproved Solved Private Closed

Primary Sidebar

Online Members

 No online members at the moment

Recent Posts

  • RichPowers

    Ultra long range Part 15 broadcasting (to space)

    While car makers appear to be opting for the licenced s...

    By RichPowers , 1 day ago

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    Shows for FM but applies to AM also.

    By Mark , 5 days ago

  • Mark

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I don't think the audio quality would be that good on t...

    By Mark , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I was very tempted to buy them both, they were dirt che...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    @mark I had to pause when you mentioned "15 minute citi...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

Recent Topics

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    By Mark 5 days ago

  • RichPowers

    Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    By RichPowers 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    From Virtue to Vice - Music Morality

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    affordable DAC Impressive Versatility “audiophile quality” Promising Big performance at small price

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    New Canadian Resident?

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

Topic Tags

  • Carl Blare3
  • KDX RADIO3
  • WINDOZE3
  • Transmitter2
  • Radio Phvern2
  • station upgrade2
  • archive.org2
  • playlist2
  • Zara Radio2
  • #SW2101
View all tags (75)

Copyright © 2026 · Part15.org · Log in

‹›×

    ‹›×