• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Part15

Part15

License Free, legal, low-power radio broadcasting

  • About Us
  • Forums
  • Resources
  • Members
  • Contact Us
  • Log In
Forums
Main Category
temp
Pre-emphasis (FM) e...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Pre-emphasis (FM) explained

 
temp
Last Post by Anonymous 14 years ago
5 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
975 Views
RSS
 12vman
(@12vman)
Posts: 21
Trusted Member Registered
Topic starter
 

I never did fully understand FM Pre-emphasis. This site made me understand the difference between 50/75 us. Enjoy..

I never did fully understand FM Pre-emphasis. This site made me understand the difference between 50/75 us. Enjoy..

http://www.claessonedwards.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=72&Itemid=89


 
Posted : 26/11/2012 3:52 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

I've always favored the European 50ms standard simply because it sounds "warmer" and not so hashy as the 75ms does. Though my stations run the US standard, I favor the 50ms.

It's all just to overcome the noise floor inherent in FM.

A joke: What is it called when your going to the bathroom in Europe? 😉

RFB


 
Posted : 26/11/2012 4:05 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

I've been looking to purchase an FM Xmtr to spread my XM Radio around my yard. After checking out some alternatives beyond a Ramsey kit, I find most of the units to be set at 50ms. I didn't know if that would be a big issue or not. Might lose a little highs but that might be a good thing. Maybe less R.F. harmonics too?


 
Posted : 26/11/2012 4:09 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

It is not required in Part 15.239 to adhere to the 75ms emphasis.

RFB


 
Posted : 26/11/2012 5:04 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

"Maybe less R.F. harmonics too?"

Running 75ms or 50ms won't matter as far as harmonics. You can run an equalizer in front of those units that are wired for 50ms and adjust for the 75.

RFB


 
Posted : 27/11/2012 1:16 pm
Forum Jump:
  Previous Topic
Next Topic  
Share:
Forum Information
Recent Posts
Unread Posts
Tags
  • 13 Forums
  • 7,756 Topics
  • 63.6 K Posts
  • 17 Online
  • 2,249 Members
Our newest member: electronic
Latest Post: Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers
Forum Icons: Forum contains no unread posts Forum contains unread posts
Topic Icons: Not Replied Replied Active Hot Sticky Unapproved Solved Private Closed

Primary Sidebar

Online Members

 No online members at the moment

Recent Posts

  • RichPowers

    Ultra long range Part 15 broadcasting (to space)

    While car makers appear to be opting for the licenced s...

    By RichPowers , 19 hours ago

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    Shows for FM but applies to AM also.

    By Mark , 4 days ago

  • Mark

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I don't think the audio quality would be that good on t...

    By Mark , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I was very tempted to buy them both, they were dirt che...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    @mark I had to pause when you mentioned "15 minute citi...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

Recent Topics

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    By Mark 4 days ago

  • RichPowers

    Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    By RichPowers 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    From Virtue to Vice - Music Morality

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    affordable DAC Impressive Versatility “audiophile quality” Promising Big performance at small price

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    New Canadian Resident?

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

Topic Tags

  • Carl Blare3
  • KDX RADIO3
  • WINDOZE3
  • Transmitter2
  • Radio Phvern2
  • station upgrade2
  • archive.org2
  • playlist2
  • Zara Radio2
  • #SW2101
View all tags (75)

Copyright © 2026 · Part15.org · Log in

‹›×

    ‹›×