• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Part15

Part15

License Free, legal, low-power radio broadcasting

  • About Us
  • Forums
  • Resources
  • Members
  • Contact Us
  • Log In
Forums
Main Category
temp
Matching the AMT300...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Matching the AMT3000 to 50ohms

 
Page 4 / 4 Prev
temp
Last Post by Anonymous 10 years ago
47 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
5,353 Views
RSS
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

No need to apologize. We all have a life outside of this hobby, and life tends to get in the way a lot.

Now your talking results with the unmodulated carrier..which is what should be happening with that unit.

Look forward to hearing about the 50 ohm match network results.

RFB


 
Posted : 22/02/2012 6:08 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

The output stage of the AMT 3000 is a differential amplifier. This is a variant of the common emitter (CE) amplifier. The output impedance of a CE amplifier is (for all practical applications) equivalent to the resistor between the collector and the power supply. For the AMT 3000 this is R18 which id 820 ohms. For a differential amp circuit we double that value, so the output impedance is 1640 ohms. With that as a starting point, one could calculate the remainder of the component value so that the output impendance of the AMT 3000 is 50 ohms. The only remaining value to consider is the Q factor of the pi network consisting of C5, C23, and the combination of L4, L5, L6, L7. 

For my case I am using a transmit frequency of 1.7 MHz (1700 KHz). The Q factor of the pi network for an unmodified AMT 3000 is about 50, and the output impedance is about 39K ohms (no antenna connected) yielding a value of 120 pF for C5. If I stick with that Q factor (50) and change the output impedance to 50 ohms then I get a value of 3.6 uH for the combination of L4-L7 and a value of 2854 pF (about 0.003 mF) for C23. The value of C5 would be 16242 pF (0.016 mF).


 
Posted : 01/01/2017 6:32 am
Page 4 / 4 Prev
Forum Jump:
  Previous Topic
Next Topic  
Share:
Forum Information
Recent Posts
Unread Posts
Tags
  • 13 Forums
  • 7,756 Topics
  • 63.6 K Posts
  • 15 Online
  • 2,249 Members
Our newest member: electronic
Latest Post: Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers
Forum Icons: Forum contains no unread posts Forum contains unread posts
Topic Icons: Not Replied Replied Active Hot Sticky Unapproved Solved Private Closed

Primary Sidebar

Online Members

 No online members at the moment

Recent Posts

  • RichPowers

    Ultra long range Part 15 broadcasting (to space)

    While car makers appear to be opting for the licenced s...

    By RichPowers , 22 hours ago

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    Shows for FM but applies to AM also.

    By Mark , 5 days ago

  • Mark

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I don't think the audio quality would be that good on t...

    By Mark , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I was very tempted to buy them both, they were dirt che...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    @mark I had to pause when you mentioned "15 minute citi...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

Recent Topics

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    By Mark 5 days ago

  • RichPowers

    Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    By RichPowers 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    From Virtue to Vice - Music Morality

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    affordable DAC Impressive Versatility “audiophile quality” Promising Big performance at small price

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    New Canadian Resident?

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

Topic Tags

  • Carl Blare3
  • KDX RADIO3
  • WINDOZE3
  • Transmitter2
  • Radio Phvern2
  • station upgrade2
  • archive.org2
  • playlist2
  • Zara Radio2
  • #SW2101
View all tags (75)

Copyright © 2026 · Part15.org · Log in

‹›×

    ‹›×