• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Part15

Part15

License Free, legal, low-power radio broadcasting

  • About Us
  • Forums
  • Resources
  • Members
  • Contact Us
  • Log In
Forums
Main Category
temp
Loudness Technology
 
Notifications
Clear all

Loudness Technology

 
temp
Last Post by Anonymous 11 years ago
4 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
585 Views
RSS
 Carl Blare
(@carl-blare)
Posts: 2621
Famed Member Registered
Topic starter
 

The most complete and informative program about audio processing and loudness technolgy for radio on this edition of "The Pub," a program about radio from the public radio magazine "Current."

http://current.org/2015/09/the-pub-36-how-loudness-technology-can-made-audio-better-with-apms-rob-byers/


 
Posted : 22/09/2015 10:33 am
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

That approach makes sense, keeping dynamics in, while not making it sound like an amateur broadcast.

It really starts with the operator. Back when, I heard school stations with newbees on the air that heard the song was too low and they'd turn it up right in the middle, or didn't use a mic so well. It sounded raw and went with the sound of new broadcasters, and they learned better.

I haven't had trouble with hearing too much of a dynamic sound on public radio. TV audio is the service that's bad to my ears, even with the loudness bills that have been past to stop the blasting on commercials. They still seem to use tricks like fooling with the separation of the stereo channels on commercials to make them seem louder.

Then there's hard limiting, two hard limit sources following one another, where just a few db of difference can sound like a lot, where you wouldn't notice that few db difference on more dynamic material.

Good info Carl.


 
Posted : 22/09/2015 6:02 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

Here's a software processor to try, and I think it could have lots of potential for your station, Sonos 4 Free, from John Burnill. It has some presets, to me they're all pretty hardline, but maybe that's the way they like things in Italy.

I did try the new Scott.fmt2, and the mids seemed to be pretty clean, and it might be good for AM Radio, FM too. It might be better to take a standard preset, copy it to a new name, then turn everything off or down, then build up from there to get the sound you want.

http://www.burnill.co.uk/

Clean, free, no demo mode and doesn't do anything bad to your Windows. The only thing bad about it is documentation is skimpy, you get no hundred page manual, just what's on the site, so if your new, use a preset first.


 
Posted : 24/09/2015 7:07 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

I finally actually listened to that podcast about processing, and it seems the effect he's using as radio processing is more of straight compression than what stations actually use now. Processors rely more on multiband limiting and low distortion clipping, with gating, windowed ALC and other circuits, so they really don't sound like the demo, and you shouldn't hear that rough kind of gain change.

Still, it was a good piece, thanks Carl.


 
Posted : 25/09/2015 8:26 pm
Forum Jump:
  Previous Topic
Next Topic  
Share:
Forum Information
Recent Posts
Unread Posts
Tags
  • 13 Forums
  • 7,756 Topics
  • 63.6 K Posts
  • 14 Online
  • 2,249 Members
Our newest member: electronic
Latest Post: Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers
Forum Icons: Forum contains no unread posts Forum contains unread posts
Topic Icons: Not Replied Replied Active Hot Sticky Unapproved Solved Private Closed

Primary Sidebar

Online Members

 No online members at the moment

Recent Posts

  • RichPowers

    Ultra long range Part 15 broadcasting (to space)

    While car makers appear to be opting for the licenced s...

    By RichPowers , 1 day ago

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    Shows for FM but applies to AM also.

    By Mark , 5 days ago

  • Mark

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I don't think the audio quality would be that good on t...

    By Mark , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I was very tempted to buy them both, they were dirt che...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    @mark I had to pause when you mentioned "15 minute citi...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

Recent Topics

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    By Mark 5 days ago

  • RichPowers

    Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    By RichPowers 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    From Virtue to Vice - Music Morality

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    affordable DAC Impressive Versatility “audiophile quality” Promising Big performance at small price

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    New Canadian Resident?

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

Topic Tags

  • Carl Blare3
  • KDX RADIO3
  • WINDOZE3
  • Transmitter2
  • Radio Phvern2
  • station upgrade2
  • archive.org2
  • playlist2
  • Zara Radio2
  • #SW2101
View all tags (75)

Copyright © 2026 · Part15.org · Log in

‹›×

    ‹›×