• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Part15

Part15

License Free, legal, low-power radio broadcasting

  • About Us
  • Forums
  • Resources
  • Members
  • Contact Us
  • Log In
Forums
Main Category
temp
Inovonics 222 and s...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Inovonics 222 and sound solution software

 
temp
Last Post by Anonymous 19 years ago
7 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
758 Views
RSS
 panthercreekestatesradio
(@panthercreekestatesradio)
Posts: 2
Active Member Registered
Topic starter
 

Hello all,

I just joined this forum and have read most posts. Learning quit a bit! But still have more questions...

Hello all,

I just joined this forum and have read most posts. Learning quit a bit! But still have more questions...

I am installing a Part 15 AM next week in North Dallas if everything arrives in the mail. I will be using a RangeMaster 1000 about 27' connected to a 10GA 25' to 8' ground rod and a Inovonics 222. I was thinking about using the ZaraRadio software.
Anyway here is the question...Does Sound solution plug in work well with the Inovonics? Or do you need the Plug in at all? Is there anything better? I just thought the sound solution plug in would preform some of the functions of the Inovonics 235 and would save me some money by purchasing the 222. There is no software that will provide me with 125% pos peaks like the 222?

Still Learning,

Chris


 
Posted : 01/03/2007 12:50 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

I use Zara automation and also tried Sound Solution,but I found it difficult to find good sounding settings. There was distortion added when using it and it chews up way too much of the computer's resources. I just use Zara's AGC into a quality equalizer and it works very well. Transmitters are the SStrans AMT3000 (which has its own built in compressor and limiter)and an EDM for FM. The sound quality exceeds what the local stations are putting out,so I never considered the thought of running a processor. Anything that alters the sound,in my opinion,is distortion! Choose your distortion carefully.Regards,Lee


 
Posted : 01/03/2007 5:17 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

I am using the 222 with a RangeMaster and Zararadio, as well as a 2 band Behringer. I found that when I use any more plug ins orZara's AGC there is just too much distortion. I also have to run the Behringer lightly. I tried with out the Behringer and used Zara's AGC into the 222 and got good results also.
Having played around with all of the pieces in the audio chain I found that the Behringer made my audio sound louder, but the inovonnics actually pushed the modulation higher, and that you can have too much proccessing.


 
Posted : 01/03/2007 5:45 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

"you can have too much proccessing."

Good point. I read a book by Bob Orbanwho pretty much said the same.

WDCX AM1610 Part 15
John
Owner-Operator-Chief Engineer-Program Manager
http://pascoradio.org/am1610


 
Posted : 16/03/2007 7:39 am
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

Hello Chris,

Which part of Dallas do you live? Plano? Frisco? Or just North Dallas?

Yves


 
Posted : 16/03/2007 6:58 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

Frisco


 
Posted : 17/03/2007 9:33 am
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

Thanks for the answers. I called Keith the other day because I am not getting a large swing in my voltage while adjusting the cap tune. He said my ground is poor and that I probably need more audio level at the transmitter. I am thinking about ordering a 3 band Behringer 802 for some eq and getting my levels up before the 222. I am getting very week audio reaching 3/4 to 1 mile away. I guess the ground does not have good conductivity right next to the foundataion. I am going to pound in 2 - 1/2" 4' copper rods out in the yard and run bare 12ga solid just under the surface and solder them to my first 8' rod. Maybe this will help. Any comments??
Chris


 
Posted : 17/03/2007 9:41 am
Forum Jump:
  Previous Topic
Next Topic  
Share:
Forum Information
Recent Posts
Unread Posts
Tags
  • 13 Forums
  • 7,756 Topics
  • 63.6 K Posts
  • 13 Online
  • 2,249 Members
Our newest member: electronic
Latest Post: Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers
Forum Icons: Forum contains no unread posts Forum contains unread posts
Topic Icons: Not Replied Replied Active Hot Sticky Unapproved Solved Private Closed

Primary Sidebar

Online Members

 No online members at the moment

Recent Posts

  • RichPowers

    Ultra long range Part 15 broadcasting (to space)

    While car makers appear to be opting for the licenced s...

    By RichPowers , 1 day ago

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    Shows for FM but applies to AM also.

    By Mark , 5 days ago

  • Mark

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I don't think the audio quality would be that good on t...

    By Mark , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I was very tempted to buy them both, they were dirt che...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    @mark I had to pause when you mentioned "15 minute citi...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

Recent Topics

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    By Mark 5 days ago

  • RichPowers

    Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    By RichPowers 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    From Virtue to Vice - Music Morality

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    affordable DAC Impressive Versatility “audiophile quality” Promising Big performance at small price

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    New Canadian Resident?

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

Topic Tags

  • Carl Blare3
  • KDX RADIO3
  • WINDOZE3
  • Transmitter2
  • Radio Phvern2
  • station upgrade2
  • archive.org2
  • playlist2
  • Zara Radio2
  • #SW2101
View all tags (75)

Copyright © 2026 · Part15.org · Log in

‹›×

    ‹›×