• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Part15

Part15

License Free, legal, low-power radio broadcasting

  • About Us
  • Forums
  • Resources
  • Members
  • Contact Us
  • Log In
Forums
Main Category
temp
Helical Wound Anten...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Helical Wound Antenna

 
temp
Last Post by Anonymous 20 years ago
7 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
712 Views
RSS
 T.ALLRED
(@t-allred)
Posts: 47
Estimable Member Registered
Topic starter
 

I am quite intersted in the Helical Wound antenna mentioned in a recent post. What would be the materials I'd need to construct one?
Travis.


 
Posted : 07/09/2006 3:56 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

I don't know yet exactly the number of winds and etc. Rich's post seemed a bit larger than needed... I found there's an FCC tech near me so I may pay him a visit and talk it over to see what his interpretation would be...

Basically-

3m of PVC pipe (2.5-3.5" in diameter)
1/4 wave worth of wire (24ga coated?) for your given frequency
Tuner (transmatch) -or- the appropriate coil
Shield was grounded x3 @ 16' deep each

I've not tried this for MW, this is basically what we used in the Army on some of our fixed HF installs. Though our pipe was a bit longer.

Somewhat like Rich's image we showed a large dB gain over the standard MilSpec doublet.

If anyone does try this please post up. I will follow up when I talk to the local FCC tech.


 
Posted : 08/09/2006 6:51 am
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

Somewhat like Rich's image we showed a large dB gain over the standard MilSpec doublet.

Just to note that my plots do not show large gain for the helical compared to the 5.15 dBi gain of a 1/4-wave monopole over a perfect ground plane.

In fact they show considerable reduction in gain relative to that monopole: about -17.5 dB for the helical radiator, and about -23 dB for the 3-meter linear radiator (1700 kHz).
//


 
Posted : 08/09/2006 8:14 am
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

I meant based on the standard doublets we used in the Army the helical had more dB gain.


 
Posted : 08/09/2006 9:23 am
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

I meant based on the standard doublets we used in the Army the helical had more dB gain.

Here's a link that might be useful.

http://www.smeter.net/antennas/helix-2.php


 
Posted : 08/09/2006 1:20 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

I meant based on the standard doublets we used in the Army the helical had more dB gain.

Just curious... what is the peak gain in dBi of the "Mil Spec Standard Doublet" you refer to? If it is the intrinsic, peak, free-space gain of a 1/2-wave doublet, it should be 2.15 dBi.

Note that installing 1/2 of this radiator configuration as a monopole over/on a perfect ground plane, and with nearby 4/3 physical earth curvature produces close to 5.15 dBi peak gain, because all radiation is confined to one hemisphere.

Also note that such a configuration has MUCH more gain than the Part 15 helical monopole in the NEC calculations I posted.
//


 
Posted : 08/09/2006 2:25 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

2 dBi sounds about right. Though this was 15 years ago so memory may be a bit weak 🙂

Thanks for the link!


 
Posted : 09/09/2006 3:58 pm
Forum Jump:
  Previous Topic
Next Topic  
Share:
Forum Information
Recent Posts
Unread Posts
Tags
  • 13 Forums
  • 7,756 Topics
  • 63.6 K Posts
  • 20 Online
  • 2,249 Members
Our newest member: electronic
Latest Post: Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers
Forum Icons: Forum contains no unread posts Forum contains unread posts
Topic Icons: Not Replied Replied Active Hot Sticky Unapproved Solved Private Closed

Primary Sidebar

Online Members

 No online members at the moment

Recent Posts

  • RichPowers

    Ultra long range Part 15 broadcasting (to space)

    While car makers appear to be opting for the licenced s...

    By RichPowers , 19 hours ago

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    Shows for FM but applies to AM also.

    By Mark , 4 days ago

  • Mark

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I don't think the audio quality would be that good on t...

    By Mark , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I was very tempted to buy them both, they were dirt che...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    @mark I had to pause when you mentioned "15 minute citi...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

Recent Topics

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    By Mark 4 days ago

  • RichPowers

    Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    By RichPowers 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    From Virtue to Vice - Music Morality

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    affordable DAC Impressive Versatility “audiophile quality” Promising Big performance at small price

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    New Canadian Resident?

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

Topic Tags

  • Carl Blare3
  • KDX RADIO3
  • WINDOZE3
  • Transmitter2
  • Radio Phvern2
  • station upgrade2
  • archive.org2
  • playlist2
  • Zara Radio2
  • #SW2101
View all tags (75)

Copyright © 2026 · Part15.org · Log in

‹›×

    ‹›×