• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Part15

Part15

License Free, legal, low-power radio broadcasting

  • About Us
  • Forums
  • Resources
  • Members
  • Contact Us
  • Log In
Forums
Main Category
temp
FT243 xtal 1610khz ...
 
Notifications
Clear all

FT243 xtal 1610khz or 1530>1600

 
temp
Last Post by Anonymous 20 years ago
4 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
661 Views
RSS
 nutzhouse
(@nutzhouse)
Posts: 2
Active Member Registered
Topic starter
 

I am looking for FT243 xtal 1610khz or 1530>1600 as
close to center freq. as possible. The digital radios have a
hard time tuning in on some of the far right or left freqs. I currently have one at 1646.8 and this is a problem.
Or could I modify the osc. section to pull down the 1646 down
to say 1640? This is a peewee tube type xmiter. Thanks in advance for help.

I am looking for FT243 xtal 1610khz or 1530>1600 as
close to center freq. as possible. The digital radios have a
hard time tuning in on some of the far right or left freqs. I currently have one at 1646.8 and this is a problem.
Or could I modify the osc. section to pull down the 1646 down
to say 1640? This is a peewee tube type xmiter. Thanks in advance for help.


 
Posted : 19/07/2006 4:33 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

Hi,

Circuit modifications will not pull the frequency much. You might get it down about 6 kHz. by adding a parallel capacitance and that is the first thing I would try.

We old hams know how to change the frequency of a FT243. Essentially, the frequency is determined by two things, first, the thickness of the crystal, and second, by the tension in the FT243 holder.

You can RAISE the frequency by removing the crystal (about a postage stamp sized element) and gently with sandpaper, take a little off the thickness. This is a trial and error process and you will need go sand a little and assemble the unit and check, sand some more, check, etc.

The final trim can be done by tightening the screw in the center of the holder. If it doesn't have a screw, the best you can do is sand, measure, sand, etc.

I have done this but crystals are not that $$$ so I think I would just buy one in a HC-6 holder cut to frequency and be done with it.

Neil


 
Posted : 19/07/2006 4:41 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

Are you saying put the cap across the xtal? If so could I use
a small rf trimmer? Or would I need to use ceramic or mylar
ones. What is your suggestion to cut down on drift since its
stable at this time.


 
Posted : 19/07/2006 5:03 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

Try a ceramic trimmer across the crystal. If you can, get one with about a 3 to 35 pF range. Anything larger will probably stop the oscillator. If you don't have a trimmer handy, try a small ceramic cap (10 to 30 pF or so). Look for a NPO type if possible though I don't think drift will be a problem unless the temperature changes quite a bit. Find out if you can pull the frequency adequately before you worry about drift.

A cap in parallel should lower the frequency, and a cap in series should raise the frequency.

If you do this, I would like to know how it worked out for you.

Neil


 
Posted : 19/07/2006 5:21 pm
Forum Jump:
  Previous Topic
Next Topic  
Share:
Forum Information
Recent Posts
Unread Posts
Tags
  • 13 Forums
  • 7,756 Topics
  • 63.6 K Posts
  • 15 Online
  • 2,249 Members
Our newest member: electronic
Latest Post: Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers
Forum Icons: Forum contains no unread posts Forum contains unread posts
Topic Icons: Not Replied Replied Active Hot Sticky Unapproved Solved Private Closed

Primary Sidebar

Online Members

 No online members at the moment

Recent Posts

  • RichPowers

    Ultra long range Part 15 broadcasting (to space)

    While car makers appear to be opting for the licenced s...

    By RichPowers , 22 hours ago

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    Shows for FM but applies to AM also.

    By Mark , 5 days ago

  • Mark

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I don't think the audio quality would be that good on t...

    By Mark , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I was very tempted to buy them both, they were dirt che...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    @mark I had to pause when you mentioned "15 minute citi...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

Recent Topics

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    By Mark 5 days ago

  • RichPowers

    Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    By RichPowers 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    From Virtue to Vice - Music Morality

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    affordable DAC Impressive Versatility “audiophile quality” Promising Big performance at small price

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    New Canadian Resident?

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

Topic Tags

  • Carl Blare3
  • KDX RADIO3
  • WINDOZE3
  • Transmitter2
  • Radio Phvern2
  • station upgrade2
  • archive.org2
  • playlist2
  • Zara Radio2
  • #SW2101
View all tags (75)

Copyright © 2026 · Part15.org · Log in

‹›×

    ‹›×