• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Part15

Part15

License Free, legal, low-power radio broadcasting

  • About Us
  • Forums
  • Resources
  • Members
  • Contact Us
  • Log In
Forums
Main Category
temp
Field Strength Ques...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Field Strength Question

 
temp
Last Post by Anonymous 12 years ago
4 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
649 Views
RSS
ArtisanRadio
 ArtisanRadio
(@artisan-radio)
Posts: 1869
Member Admin
Topic starter
 

Canadian unlicensed AM regulations for broadcasting state that you can have a maximum field strength of 250uv/m at 30 meters.

I know that it has been discussed in previous threads what the field strength would be for a ground-mounted 100 mw transmitter - but I can't find those threads in a search (perhaps I'm just not using the right keywords).  In any event, does anyone have that number available?  I'm just attempting to decide whether it's worthwhile to attempt to use AM or not in my new location.

[Canadian rules for unlicensed BROADCASTING (BETS-1, 5 & 6) are different than those for unlicensed non-broadcasting applications (governed by RSS-210).  There is no 100 mw rule for unlicensed AM broadcasting, and it is governed by field strength alone.  Interestingly, the rules for unlicensed FM are slanted in favour of broadcasting - RSS-210 only allows a field strength of 250uv/m at 3 meters, whereas BETS allows 1000uv/m at 3 meters or 100uv/m at 30 meters).

This mess of rules is ignored by the transmitter manufacturers, and quite often by low power broadcasters here.  I've never heard of anyone being shut down for broadcasting using an RSS-210 certified transmitter running at 100 mw, but the rules state that it is certainly possible.  In fact, I've never heard of ANY enforcement actions here in Canada with unlicensed AM, other than obvious pirates.]


 
Posted : 09/01/2015 5:03 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

Artisan, I don't recall anyone posting actual field strength measurements for ground mounted AM antennas, probably because it would depend so much on antenna design, ground radials, soil propagation and so on.

This post by PhilB, inventer of the AMT5000, describes the antenna/ground arrangement known to give the best results.

http://www.part15.us/forum/part15-forums/general-discussion/ultimate-part-15-am-installation


 
Posted : 10/01/2015 3:47 am
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

"What the field strength would be for a ground-mounted 100 mw transmitter."

A simple question for which there is no simple answer, unfortunately.  But here are some examples showing about what to expect for the conditions shown.

There are thousands of possible variations for the values in the first three columns below.  Probably all of them are inaccurately known -- even by manufacturers of the transmitters designed and used for unlicensed systems.

 

 

 


 
Posted : 10/01/2015 5:29 am
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

Thanks.  Just what I was looking for.  It just confirms what I thought - that FM is the way to go in Canada for (legal) unlicensed broadcasting.


 
Posted : 11/01/2015 9:17 am
Forum Jump:
  Previous Topic
Next Topic  
Share:
Forum Information
Recent Posts
Unread Posts
Tags
  • 13 Forums
  • 7,756 Topics
  • 63.6 K Posts
  • 8 Online
  • 2,249 Members
Our newest member: electronic
Latest Post: Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers
Forum Icons: Forum contains no unread posts Forum contains unread posts
Topic Icons: Not Replied Replied Active Hot Sticky Unapproved Solved Private Closed

Primary Sidebar

Online Members

 No online members at the moment

Recent Posts

  • RichPowers

    Ultra long range Part 15 broadcasting (to space)

    While car makers appear to be opting for the licenced s...

    By RichPowers , 1 day ago

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    Shows for FM but applies to AM also.

    By Mark , 5 days ago

  • Mark

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I don't think the audio quality would be that good on t...

    By Mark , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I was very tempted to buy them both, they were dirt che...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    @mark I had to pause when you mentioned "15 minute citi...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

Recent Topics

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    By Mark 5 days ago

  • RichPowers

    Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    By RichPowers 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    From Virtue to Vice - Music Morality

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    affordable DAC Impressive Versatility “audiophile quality” Promising Big performance at small price

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    New Canadian Resident?

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

Topic Tags

  • Carl Blare3
  • KDX RADIO3
  • WINDOZE3
  • Transmitter2
  • Radio Phvern2
  • station upgrade2
  • archive.org2
  • playlist2
  • Zara Radio2
  • #SW2101
View all tags (75)

Copyright © 2026 · Part15.org · Log in

‹›×

    ‹›×