• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Part15

Part15

License Free, legal, low-power radio broadcasting

  • About Us
  • Forums
  • Resources
  • Members
  • Contact Us
  • Log In
Forums
Main Category
temp
C Crane FM Transmit...
 
Notifications
Clear all

C Crane FM Transmitter to what receiver?

 
Page 3 / 3 Prev
temp
Last Post by Anonymous 14 years ago
32 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
4,672 Views
RSS
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

Based on many comments made in discussions here at part15.us and following enforcement trends, I have concluded that FM is no place for a serious Part 15 Broadcaster.

The radio industry and their private police force (fcc) are determined to crush free activities on the FM band.

I will be coming back in the weeks ahead with an announcement about the replacement technologies to be employed to replace our FM Studio Transmitter Link (STL).

FM was a great invention by Major Edwin Armstrong, but it is not being used to its advantage in delivering quality music, and is being abandoned by listeners and generally replaced by newer mediums.

Either me or someone will compile a summary of effective STL methods, which will not list FM radio as one method.


 
Posted : 08/01/2013 2:34 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

I didn't post about the rogue FM transmitter boards to discourage you Carl 🙂

Enforcement seems to be in limited areas and where content is competitive or signal is way over power or really interfering with other signals.

95% of the land mass of the US seems to have no enforcement actions for AM or FM. I don't think Part15 and similar folks aren't in those areas.

Ideally the ALPB starts and enforcement tracker for actions against independent broadcasters doing unlicensed. Since FCC is rather skeleton crew, agents likely have large areas and their enforcement would impact people in a large area. So becoming compliant with that agent should be something someone does and others replicate.


 
Posted : 08/01/2013 3:33 pm
Page 3 / 3 Prev
Forum Jump:
  Previous Topic
Next Topic  
Share:
Forum Information
Recent Posts
Unread Posts
Tags
  • 13 Forums
  • 7,756 Topics
  • 63.6 K Posts
  • 15 Online
  • 2,249 Members
Our newest member: electronic
Latest Post: Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers
Forum Icons: Forum contains no unread posts Forum contains unread posts
Topic Icons: Not Replied Replied Active Hot Sticky Unapproved Solved Private Closed

Primary Sidebar

Online Members

 No online members at the moment

Recent Posts

  • RichPowers

    Ultra long range Part 15 broadcasting (to space)

    While car makers appear to be opting for the licenced s...

    By RichPowers , 22 hours ago

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    Shows for FM but applies to AM also.

    By Mark , 5 days ago

  • Mark

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I don't think the audio quality would be that good on t...

    By Mark , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I was very tempted to buy them both, they were dirt che...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    @mark I had to pause when you mentioned "15 minute citi...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

Recent Topics

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    By Mark 5 days ago

  • RichPowers

    Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    By RichPowers 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    From Virtue to Vice - Music Morality

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    affordable DAC Impressive Versatility “audiophile quality” Promising Big performance at small price

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    New Canadian Resident?

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

Topic Tags

  • Carl Blare3
  • KDX RADIO3
  • WINDOZE3
  • Transmitter2
  • Radio Phvern2
  • station upgrade2
  • archive.org2
  • playlist2
  • Zara Radio2
  • #SW2101
View all tags (75)

Copyright © 2026 · Part15.org · Log in

‹›×

    ‹›×