• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Part15

Part15

License Free, legal, low-power radio broadcasting

  • About Us
  • Forums
  • Resources
  • Members
  • Contact Us
  • Log In
Forums
Main Category
temp
Another bizarre one...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Another bizarre one where Part 15 was cited

 
temp
Last Post by Anonymous 11 years ago
9 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
474 Views
RSS
 wdcx
(@wdcx)
Posts: 444
Noble Member Registered
Topic starter
 

http://www.arrl.org/news/fcc-issues-10-000-fine-to-missouri-man-for-unlicensed-operation-on-14-312-mhz


 
Posted : 17/04/2015 6:30 am
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

To set up strengthy transmitter/linear operations to speak over the air has got to be motivated by the need to say something in the hope that someone is tuned in.

What was the Missouri guy saying into his microphone?

Could it have been done by telephone?


 
Posted : 17/04/2015 6:49 am
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

The frequency cited is very close to a popular jamming frequency used by LIDS which many have licenses. It is also home to the Crazy Canadian.  See below link:

http://members.shaw.ca/ve7kfm/


 
Posted : 17/04/2015 7:08 am
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

The article refers twice to an "unlicensed transmitter". Transmitters are not licensed for the ham bands, operators are. The folks at ARRL know that (or should).

With the relative ease of obtaining a ham license, especially if you already had one, it is surprising that the operator didn't renew or upgrade.

I wonder what kind of "interference" he was creating to prompt a complaint. It is hard to imagine that ham operators check the validity of the licenses of other hams on a routine basis but anything is possible I suppose.

Neil


 
Posted : 17/04/2015 8:32 am
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

OMG! Hams narc on each other all the time.  I knew a blind ham that was cited for operating 5KC's out of the novice band when he was talking to someone in CW.  They are the first to narc on a part 15 FM station if they are 251 Uv/M instead of 250.  Trust and believe from experience they do play Radio police and scan AM and FM for distant and pirate Radio.


 
Posted : 17/04/2015 9:15 am
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

Neil if you look at the NAL it is the FCC who used the phrase "unlicensed radio transmitter."


 
Posted : 17/04/2015 11:06 am
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

John,

You are correct that this phrase was used in the NAL but reading further they cite:

"1 47 U.S.C. § 301.
2 Part 15 of the Rules sets out the conditions and technical requirements under which certain radio transmission devices may be used without a license. In relevant part, Section 15.209 of the Rules provides that non-licensed operation in the 1.705-30 MHz band is permitted only if the field strength of the transmission does not exceed 30 μV/m at thirty meters. 47 C.F.R. § 15.209."

which references the use of "certain devices". A picky point which doesn't change the outcome.

Neil


 
Posted : 17/04/2015 9:46 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

The project name for our next home-made part 15 hobby transmitter will be CERTAIN DEVICE.


 
Posted : 18/04/2015 3:57 am
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

 As a former Technician class licensee...

He knew better.. Shame on him.. Pretty simple!


 
Posted : 19/04/2015 5:00 am
Forum Jump:
  Previous Topic
Next Topic  
Share:
Forum Information
Recent Posts
Unread Posts
Tags
  • 13 Forums
  • 7,756 Topics
  • 63.6 K Posts
  • 15 Online
  • 2,249 Members
Our newest member: electronic
Latest Post: Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers
Forum Icons: Forum contains no unread posts Forum contains unread posts
Topic Icons: Not Replied Replied Active Hot Sticky Unapproved Solved Private Closed

Primary Sidebar

Online Members

 No online members at the moment

Recent Posts

  • RichPowers

    Ultra long range Part 15 broadcasting (to space)

    While car makers appear to be opting for the licenced s...

    By RichPowers , 1 day ago

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    Shows for FM but applies to AM also.

    By Mark , 5 days ago

  • Mark

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I don't think the audio quality would be that good on t...

    By Mark , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I was very tempted to buy them both, they were dirt che...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    @mark I had to pause when you mentioned "15 minute citi...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

Recent Topics

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    By Mark 5 days ago

  • RichPowers

    Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    By RichPowers 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    From Virtue to Vice - Music Morality

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    affordable DAC Impressive Versatility “audiophile quality” Promising Big performance at small price

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    New Canadian Resident?

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

Topic Tags

  • Carl Blare3
  • KDX RADIO3
  • WINDOZE3
  • Transmitter2
  • Radio Phvern2
  • station upgrade2
  • archive.org2
  • playlist2
  • Zara Radio2
  • #SW2101
View all tags (75)

Copyright © 2026 · Part15.org · Log in

‹›×

    ‹›×