• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Part15

Part15

License Free, legal, low-power radio broadcasting

  • About Us
  • Forums
  • Resources
  • Members
  • Contact Us
  • Log In
Forums
Main Category
temp
Accurate Measuremen...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Accurate Measurement of Field Intensity

 
temp
Last Post by Anonymous 10 years ago
6 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
927 Views
RSS
 Rich
(@rich)
Posts: 207
Reputable Member Registered
Topic starter
 

The NIST has a good paper on the complexities of this topic.  See

https://www.nist.gov/document-14711

Below is a clip from that paper describing how a calibrated receive antenna can be used with an r-f spectrum analyzer for measurement of electric field intensity.

Note that the Antenna Factor of the receive antenna accurately must be known.

The only way to determine that is for it to be tested/characterized using those physical and electrical conditions when "immersed" in an accurately known radiated field, for those conditions.


 
Posted : 02/01/2017 3:52 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

Below is clip from the IEEE paper NBS Field-Strength Standards and Measurements showing how the height above the earth of a 1/2-wave dipole antenna affects the field intensity it receives.

This shows the importance when making accurate field intensity measurements of using the receive antenna at the height above ground at which its antenna factor was measured.

Measuring error increases rapidly for changes in antenna height, for low elevations above the earth.

(The complete IEEE paper is available at http://tinyurl.com/gne9vbv)


 
Posted : 03/01/2017 5:44 am
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

I wish I had the mindset better capable of really understanding such post.


 
Posted : 03/01/2017 6:50 am
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

?cb=1464842488

 


 
Posted : 03/01/2017 7:10 am
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

The graphic linked in Reply 4 above states that the antenna used to measure field intensity should be "height-scanned over 1-4 metres to find the maximum emissions ... for both horizontal and vertical polarisations."

However if such measurements are accurately to be made, that requires knowledge of the antenna factor (AF) of that receive antenna at the test frequency across that 1-4 meter "height scan," for both vertical and horizontal polarization of that receive antenna.  Otherwise those measurements will NOT be accurate.

Does anything in EN 55022 recognize this, and address it?


 
Posted : 03/01/2017 2:37 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

If you're simply taking field intensity to determine if a transmitter is legal such scanning would most likely not be necessary.

e.g. I do my tests at 7 feet simply because this is one of the two heights documented in the FIM-71 manual and antenna factors are supplied.  so, when I take a reading and find the transmitter to be many multiples above the lega limit there's really no need to determine where the maximum FI might be, as it's already been determined to be over the limit. 

However, testing for compliance in a lab this information would be needed, as certification would require all emissions at any height to be under the limit. 

TIB


 
Posted : 04/01/2017 2:13 am
Forum Jump:
  Previous Topic
Next Topic  
Share:
Forum Information
Recent Posts
Unread Posts
Tags
  • 13 Forums
  • 7,756 Topics
  • 63.6 K Posts
  • 16 Online
  • 2,249 Members
Our newest member: electronic
Latest Post: Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers
Forum Icons: Forum contains no unread posts Forum contains unread posts
Topic Icons: Not Replied Replied Active Hot Sticky Unapproved Solved Private Closed

Primary Sidebar

Online Members

 No online members at the moment

Recent Posts

  • RichPowers

    Ultra long range Part 15 broadcasting (to space)

    While car makers appear to be opting for the licenced s...

    By RichPowers , 1 day ago

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    Shows for FM but applies to AM also.

    By Mark , 5 days ago

  • Mark

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I don't think the audio quality would be that good on t...

    By Mark , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I was very tempted to buy them both, they were dirt che...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    @mark I had to pause when you mentioned "15 minute citi...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

Recent Topics

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    By Mark 5 days ago

  • RichPowers

    Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    By RichPowers 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    From Virtue to Vice - Music Morality

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    affordable DAC Impressive Versatility “audiophile quality” Promising Big performance at small price

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    New Canadian Resident?

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

Topic Tags

  • Carl Blare3
  • KDX RADIO3
  • WINDOZE3
  • Transmitter2
  • Radio Phvern2
  • station upgrade2
  • archive.org2
  • playlist2
  • Zara Radio2
  • #SW2101
View all tags (75)

Copyright © 2026 · Part15.org · Log in

‹›×

    ‹›×