• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Part15

Part15

License Free, legal, low-power radio broadcasting

  • About Us
  • Forums
  • Resources
  • Members
  • Contact Us
  • Log In
Forums
Main Category
temp
A filter for 13870 ...
 
Notifications
Clear all

A filter for 13870 kHz

 
temp
Last Post by Anonymous 15 years ago
5 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
555 Views
RSS
 Radio Bon Esprit
(@radio-bon-esprit)
Posts: 3
Active Member Registered
Topic starter
 

SCWIS, or anyone, I remember that a filter was calculated for 13.560, but here in France I cannot use that frequency, so I need a filter for 13.870mHz. Can you help?

Thanks !

SCWIS, or anyone, I remember that a filter was calculated for 13.560, but here in France I cannot use that frequency, so I need a filter for 13.870mHz. Can you help?

Thanks !

Bertrand at Radio Bon Esprit


 
Posted : 24/06/2011 9:45 am
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

Try this link:

http://www.wa4dsy.net/filter/filterdesign.html

Neil


 
Posted : 24/06/2011 10:20 am
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

Thanks Neil,

But how to find 0.1000 uH 0.4613 uH (or 0,5) and 1.30 uH components Does it exist ?

My problem is that with the present filter (13560 kHz) I have a great loss of power, using Power Pixie withe Q1 2N2219 and Q2 2N3053. After the filter, HF power does not exist anymore. Does it come from the filter ?..

Thanks


 
Posted : 24/06/2011 10:36 am
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

It is not likely that a filter designed for 13.56 MHz would have significant loss at 13.8 MHz because standard designs set the cutoff frequency at about 1.2 times the "nominal" frequency. Maybe something else is wrong. You could try decreasing the capacitor values by about 10% but I don't think this will work.

As for calculated parts values, there are a couple of ways to find parts for filters. One is to use the closest standard values. For this type of low pass filter use the closest smaller standard value for the inductors and capacitors. This will raise the cutoff frequency but there is plenty of tolerance for this before the second harmonic will pass. Generally, these filters are designed to have the cutoff frequency 1.2 times the operating frequency. There will be little harm if this is raised by the smaller value components (within reason).

Another approach is to wind your own inductors. This would involve obtaining some toroid cores suitable for the frequency of operation and calculating the number of turns required.

The loss you observed could be due to the filter if the inductors or capacitors have high loss at 13-14 MHz. Using the correct toroid cores and low loss capacitors I have observed loss of about 1 dB (about 11%) in a 5 pole filter at 1680 kHz.

You might also consider the use of the 2N3053. This has a rather low gain-bandwidth product (Ft) of 100 MHz. One with an Ft of 300 to 500 MHz would probably work better.

Neil


 
Posted : 24/06/2011 12:37 pm
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

Thank you Neil,

I checked the filter, apparently, nothing wrong. But still a little power at L4/C8 and nearly nothing behind ...

What do you think of the 2N3553 for example ? (Ft = 500) (RF performance = 175 mHz)

Bertrand


 
Posted : 25/06/2011 7:18 am
Forum Jump:
  Previous Topic
Next Topic  
Share:
Forum Information
Recent Posts
Unread Posts
Tags
  • 13 Forums
  • 7,756 Topics
  • 63.6 K Posts
  • 3 Online
  • 2,249 Members
Our newest member: electronic
Latest Post: Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers
Forum Icons: Forum contains no unread posts Forum contains unread posts
Topic Icons: Not Replied Replied Active Hot Sticky Unapproved Solved Private Closed

Primary Sidebar

Online Members

 No online members at the moment

Recent Posts

  • RichPowers

    Ultra long range Part 15 broadcasting (to space)

    While car makers appear to be opting for the licenced s...

    By RichPowers , 1 day ago

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    Shows for FM but applies to AM also.

    By Mark , 5 days ago

  • Mark

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I don't think the audio quality would be that good on t...

    By Mark , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I was very tempted to buy them both, they were dirt che...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    @mark I had to pause when you mentioned "15 minute citi...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

Recent Topics

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    By Mark 5 days ago

  • RichPowers

    Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    By RichPowers 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    From Virtue to Vice - Music Morality

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    affordable DAC Impressive Versatility “audiophile quality” Promising Big performance at small price

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    New Canadian Resident?

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

Topic Tags

  • Carl Blare3
  • KDX RADIO3
  • WINDOZE3
  • Transmitter2
  • Radio Phvern2
  • station upgrade2
  • archive.org2
  • playlist2
  • Zara Radio2
  • #SW2101
View all tags (75)

Copyright © 2026 · Part15.org · Log in

‹›×

    ‹›×