• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Part15

Part15

License Free, legal, low-power radio broadcasting

  • About Us
  • Forums
  • Resources
  • Members
  • Contact Us
  • Log In
Forums
Main Category
Regulations / Law
FCC Saves Us $567 M...
 
Notifications
Clear all

FCC Saves Us $567 Million So Far

 
Regulations / Law
Last Post by ArtisanRadio 1 year ago
6 Posts
4 Users
0 Reactions
2,659 Views
RSS
RichPowers
 RichPowers
(@richpowers)
Posts: 3404
Illustrious Member Registered
Topic starter
 

From the FCCs recent news release:
FCC's Initial Contract Review Saves Taxpayers Millions of Dollars

"...No stone is being left unturned. To date, we have reduced more than $567 million in authorized contract spending, including by ending bloated or unnecessary IT contracts. This is an important step towards ensuring long-term efficiency and maintaining our focus on the FCC’s core responsibilities... ...the FCC has reduced the total contract ceiling value by more than $567 million..
..More broadly, the Commission is working to improve agency efficiency by removing unnecessary rules
and regulations. Its “In Re: Delete, Delete, Delete” initiative seeks to identify outdated and overly burdensome regulations ... seeks to terminate over 2,000 official proceedings that have become dormant and no longer serve a purpose for the American people.

https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DOC-411428A1.pdf


 
Posted : 17/05/2025 12:19 pm
RichPowers
 RichPowers
(@richpowers)
Posts: 3404
Illustrious Member Registered
Topic starter
 

It makes me wonder what exactly "IT contracts" are that by eliminating them they saved over five hundred million dollars..

Google tells me:

"IT contracts are legal agreements that define the terms and conditions of business relationships in the information technology (IT) sector. They cover various aspects like software development, licensing, cloud services, data processing, and IT outsourcing, outlining the rights and obligations of all parties involved."


 
Posted : 17/05/2025 12:25 pm
ArtisanRadio
 ArtisanRadio
(@artisan-radio)
Posts: 1869
Member Admin
 

These kinds of government statements are the ultimate in obfuscation.

They're really only eliminating budget line items.  And the fact of the matter is that day to day operations rely on some of these budget line items.  There may be contracts you can't get out of, contracts with penalty clauses, or you may be reliant on some services that just can't be eliminated.

Just by eliminating the budget line items doesn't necessarily mean that you're not going to spend the money (which is a whole different thing).


 
Posted : 18/05/2025 4:30 pm
Centinel
 Centinel
(@centinel)
Posts: 264
Reputable Member Registered
 

"saves". Perhaps what they mean is they will not spend it. "Saves" is retail gobbledygook to convince you not to have buyer regret.


 
Posted : 19/05/2025 3:05 pm
Roy
 Roy
(@wefr)
Posts: 358
Honorable Member Registered
 

Looks and sounds like smoke and mirrors to me.


 
Posted : 20/05/2025 1:17 am
ArtisanRadio
 ArtisanRadio
(@artisan-radio)
Posts: 1869
Member Admin
 

Exactly.  That's essentially what government budgeting is.


 
Posted : 20/05/2025 12:26 pm
Forum Jump:
  Previous Topic
Next Topic  
Share:
Forum Information
Recent Posts
Unread Posts
Tags
  • 13 Forums
  • 7,756 Topics
  • 63.6 K Posts
  • 12 Online
  • 2,249 Members
Our newest member: electronic
Latest Post: Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers
Forum Icons: Forum contains no unread posts Forum contains unread posts
Topic Icons: Not Replied Replied Active Hot Sticky Unapproved Solved Private Closed

Primary Sidebar

Online Members

 No online members at the moment

Recent Posts

  • RichPowers

    Ultra long range Part 15 broadcasting (to space)

    While car makers appear to be opting for the licenced s...

    By RichPowers , 12 hours ago

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    Shows for FM but applies to AM also.

    By Mark , 4 days ago

  • Mark

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I don't think the audio quality would be that good on t...

    By Mark , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I was very tempted to buy them both, they were dirt che...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    @mark I had to pause when you mentioned "15 minute citi...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

Recent Topics

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    By Mark 4 days ago

  • RichPowers

    Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    By RichPowers 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    From Virtue to Vice - Music Morality

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    affordable DAC Impressive Versatility “audiophile quality” Promising Big performance at small price

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    New Canadian Resident?

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

Topic Tags

  • Carl Blare3
  • KDX RADIO3
  • WINDOZE3
  • Transmitter2
  • Radio Phvern2
  • station upgrade2
  • archive.org2
  • playlist2
  • Zara Radio2
  • #SW2101
View all tags (75)

Copyright © 2026 · Part15.org · Log in

‹›×

    ‹›×