• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Part15

Part15

License Free, legal, low-power radio broadcasting

  • About Us
  • Forums
  • Resources
  • Members
  • Contact Us
  • Log In
Forums
Main Category
Regulations / Law
FCC Bans “bad Labs”
 
Notifications
Clear all

FCC Bans “bad Labs”

 
Regulations / Law
Last Post by ArtisanRadio 1 year ago
5 Posts
3 Users
0 Reactions
2,849 Views
RSS
RichPowers
 RichPowers
(@richpowers)
Posts: 3404
Illustrious Member Registered
Topic starter
 

Surprised this hasn't come up yet as it's seems to be saturating the news all over the place right now..

FCC Bans “bad Labs” From Certifying Devices For The U.S. Market - May 24, 2025-

http://m.radiowalkietalkie.com/news/fcc-bans-bad-labs-from-certifying-devices-fo-85096507.html

"The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has unanimously approved a new rule designed to prevent foreign adversaries from owning or controlling equipment testing labs and certification bodies responsible for approving wireless electronic devices for the U.S. market...

...The new rules will not have a retroactive effect on existing equipment certifications. However,..

...The "bad labs" defined by the FCC mainly include the following situations:
First, testing laboratories, certification bodies and laboratory accreditation bodies owned, controlled or directed by "restricted entities" will be identified as "bad labs". ...that are considered to pose a threat to US national security... ..and laboratories that fail to provide accurate information or provide false information will also lose their accreditation..."

..


 
Posted : 24/05/2025 1:04 pm
ArtisanRadio
 ArtisanRadio
(@artisan-radio)
Posts: 1869
Member Admin
 

The FCC has had plenty of time and plenty of evidence to get rid of labs that falsify results.  And they haven't.

I don't think that this has much to do with radio; it's more politics (as indicated by the statements about "foreign adversaries").

It's certainly not going to stop pirates, who don't give a fig about the regulations, certification, and potential interference.  The only way to do that is to stop the sale and importation of illegal devices.  You'll still be left with those who roll their own, but it's an easy way to stop the casual ones.


This post was modified 1 year ago 2 times by ArtisanRadio
 
Posted : 24/05/2025 1:52 pm
RichPowers
 RichPowers
(@richpowers)
Posts: 3404
Illustrious Member Registered
Topic starter
 

@artisan-radio Well, unless I'm misinterpreting, this has now already gone into effect and now has already put a stop to the falsely certificated products entering the market.

I agree it's all primarily political- but the results are that the "bad labs" can no longer certify products bogusly.


 
Posted : 24/05/2025 2:03 pm
Mark
 Mark
(@mark)
Posts: 2330
Member Moderator
 

It won't stop the Chinese transmitters from selling on Amazon and Ebay. And the CZH 05B under many other brand names like Retekess, Rangestar, whatever, can keep the certification it has.


 
Posted : 24/05/2025 2:44 pm
ArtisanRadio
 ArtisanRadio
(@artisan-radio)
Posts: 1869
Member Admin
 

I was curious who the FCC defined as foreign adversaries, and read the press release.  The only country mentioned in it is China.


 
Posted : 24/05/2025 4:21 pm
Forum Jump:
  Previous Topic
Next Topic  
Share:
Forum Information
Recent Posts
Unread Posts
Tags
  • 13 Forums
  • 7,756 Topics
  • 63.6 K Posts
  • 11 Online
  • 2,249 Members
Our newest member: electronic
Latest Post: Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers
Forum Icons: Forum contains no unread posts Forum contains unread posts
Topic Icons: Not Replied Replied Active Hot Sticky Unapproved Solved Private Closed

Primary Sidebar

Online Members

 No online members at the moment

Recent Posts

  • RichPowers

    Ultra long range Part 15 broadcasting (to space)

    While car makers appear to be opting for the licenced s...

    By RichPowers , 4 hours ago

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    Shows for FM but applies to AM also.

    By Mark , 4 days ago

  • Mark

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I don't think the audio quality would be that good on t...

    By Mark , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I was very tempted to buy them both, they were dirt che...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    @mark I had to pause when you mentioned "15 minute citi...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

Recent Topics

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    By Mark 4 days ago

  • RichPowers

    Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    By RichPowers 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    From Virtue to Vice - Music Morality

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    affordable DAC Impressive Versatility “audiophile quality” Promising Big performance at small price

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    New Canadian Resident?

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

Topic Tags

  • Carl Blare3
  • KDX RADIO3
  • WINDOZE3
  • Transmitter2
  • Radio Phvern2
  • station upgrade2
  • archive.org2
  • playlist2
  • Zara Radio2
  • #SW2101
View all tags (75)

Copyright © 2026 · Part15.org · Log in

‹›×

    ‹›×