• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Part15

Part15

License Free, legal, low-power radio broadcasting

  • About Us
  • Forums
  • Resources
  • Members
  • Contact Us
  • Log In
Forums
Main Category
General Radio Discu...
WION - A Full Power...
 
Notifications
Clear all

WION - A Full Powered CQUAM AM Station

 
General Radio Discussion
Last Post by mighty1650 8 years ago
7 Posts
5 Users
0 Reactions
896 Views
RSS
ArtisanRadio
 ArtisanRadio
(@artisan-radio)
Posts: 1869
Member Admin
Topic starter
 

Recently, there has been a lot of discussion about AM Stereo, and CQUAM in particular.

A recent post over at the ALPB Forum mentions WION, a full powered AM station that broadcasts in CQUAM.

http://www.i1430.com/

Apparently, they take their Internet feed from the output of a Carver receiver, so streaming listeners really do hear what the station sounds like over-the-air.

AM stereo still lives on.


 
Posted : 20/08/2018 1:40 am
 Carl Blare
(@carl-blare)
Posts: 2621
Famed Member Registered
 

Few and Far

Some radio stations are owned and operated by people who actually like radio and know a lot about it.


 
Posted : 20/08/2018 4:55 am
 Thelegacy
(@thelegacy)
Posts: 300
Reputable Member Registered
 

There has been a lot of talk about that station on both the I love AM radio for him on Facebook and the c-quam AM stereo Forum on Facebook. These folks have it right.

I am going to be promoting c-quam AM stereo as hard as I can because I think it's well worth saving. Also if ever there was going to be a hobby broadcast service I would make C-Quam mandatory.  If more people become aware of c-quam AM stereo I think eventually manufacturers will start making the receivers more readily available. It just takes people to become more aware just like when video LaserDisc was out it took 10 years for the public to catch on.


 
Posted : 22/08/2018 10:04 am
 AMRadiolegend
(@amradiolegend)
Posts: 335
Reputable Member Registered
 

If you make things mandatory its no longer a hobby. If C-Quam was worth saving it wouldn't need to be saved.


 
Posted : 22/08/2018 8:59 pm
ArtisanRadio
 ArtisanRadio
(@artisan-radio)
Posts: 1869
Member Admin
Topic starter
 

Not sure I quite agree with the notion about the worth of CQUAM.  Sometimes the best technical solutions don't win out in the general marketplace.  It could be price, it could be just plain marketing, such as launching the product.

I look to Beta as the perfect example.  Technically, it was far superior to VHS, but the latter surpassed it because the inventors made it easier to bring recorders/players to market (Sony really blew it there), and undercut Beta pricing.

I do agree with the mandatory bit.  I get amused when people attack the FCC for doing their job of regulating the airwaves by going after pirates, and yet want more regulation in areas over which the FCC really has no control, such as receiver capabilities.  You can't have it both ways (well, I guess you can try, but it generally doesn't work).


 
Posted : 23/08/2018 12:54 am
 Carl Blare
(@carl-blare)
Posts: 2621
Famed Member Registered
 

It's All Cool

The "general public", which is referred earlier, has way more choices than they ever know they have, and easily miss out on some of them.

With FM stereo "doing the job" the average person is unlikely to pay attention to having the "other choice" of AM stereo.

For the relatively brief time spent in a car, stereo may not stand out against the loud trucks and other highway noise, where "just hearing a voice" might be a challenge.

For KDX, we love technology and think CQUAM is a very fascinating subject, but have no practical use for it.


 
Posted : 23/08/2018 5:48 am
 mighty1650
(@mighty1650)
Posts: 58
Estimable Member Registered
 

Technically Stereo operation was a preferred requirement to get an expanded band license but they ended up not enforcing it. Likely due to the lack of receivers.


 
Posted : 27/08/2018 11:14 pm
Forum Jump:
  Previous Topic
Next Topic  
Share:
Forum Information
Recent Posts
Unread Posts
Tags
  • 13 Forums
  • 7,756 Topics
  • 63.6 K Posts
  • 7 Online
  • 2,249 Members
Our newest member: electronic
Latest Post: Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers
Forum Icons: Forum contains no unread posts Forum contains unread posts
Topic Icons: Not Replied Replied Active Hot Sticky Unapproved Solved Private Closed

Primary Sidebar

Online Members

 No online members at the moment

Recent Posts

  • RichPowers

    Ultra long range Part 15 broadcasting (to space)

    While car makers appear to be opting for the licenced s...

    By RichPowers , 4 hours ago

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    Shows for FM but applies to AM also.

    By Mark , 4 days ago

  • Mark

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I don't think the audio quality would be that good on t...

    By Mark , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Early 80s Realty Radio' AM transmitters

    I was very tempted to buy them both, they were dirt che...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    RE: Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    @mark I had to pause when you mentioned "15 minute citi...

    By RichPowers , 2 weeks ago

Recent Topics

  • Mark

    Here's a look at why we do processing and what each function does.

    By Mark 4 days ago

  • RichPowers

    Part 15 Too Restrictive for Automakers

    By RichPowers 2 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    From Virtue to Vice - Music Morality

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    affordable DAC Impressive Versatility “audiophile quality” Promising Big performance at small price

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

  • RichPowers

    New Canadian Resident?

    By RichPowers 3 weeks ago

Topic Tags

  • Carl Blare3
  • KDX RADIO3
  • WINDOZE3
  • Transmitter2
  • Radio Phvern2
  • station upgrade2
  • archive.org2
  • playlist2
  • Zara Radio2
  • #SW2101
View all tags (75)

Copyright © 2026 · Part15.org · Log in

‹›×

    ‹›×